The Power Triangle
The three quantities average power, apparent power, and reactive
power can be related in the vector domain by
with
For an inductive load, the phasor power S, as it is often called, is
defined by
as shown in [Fig. 1].
The $90^\circ$ shift in $Q_L$ from $P$ is the source of another term for reactive power: quadrature power.
For a capacitive load, the phasor power $S$ is defined by
as shown in [Fig. 2].
If a network has both capacitive and inductive elements, the reactive
component of the power triangle will be determined by the difference
between the reactive power delivered to each. If $Q_L > Q_C$, the resultant
power triangle will be similar to [Fig. 1]. If $Q_C > Q_L$, the resultant
power triangle will be similar to [Fig. 2].
That the total reactive power is the difference between the reactive
powers of the inductive and capacitive elements can be demonstrated by
considering Equations of previous topics.
An additional verification can be derived by first considering the
impedance diagram of a series RLC circuit ([Fig. 3]).
If we multiply each radius vector by the current squared ($I^2$), we obtain the results
shown in [Fig. 4], which is the power triangle for a predominantly
inductive circuit.
Since the reactive power and average power are always angled $90^\circ$ to each other, the three powers are related by the Pythagorean theorem; that is,
Therefore, the third power can always be found if the other two are
known.
It is particularly interesting that the equation
will provide the vector form of the apparent power of a system. Here,
V is the voltage across the system, and $I^*$ is the complex conjugate of
the current.
Consider, for example, the simple RL circuit of [Fig. 5], where
The real power (the term real being derived from the positive real axis
of the complex plane) is
and the reactive power is
with
as shown in [Fig. 6]. Applying Eq. (1) yields
as obtained above.
The angle $\theta$ associated with S and appearing in Figs. 1, 2,
and 6 is the power-factor angle of the network. Since
or
then
$$ \bbox[10px,border:1px solid grey]{S = P + jQ } \tag{1}$$
$$ P = p \angle 0^\circ \,\, Q_L = Q_l \angle 90^\circ \,\,Q_C = Q_c \angle -90^\circ $$
$$S = P + j Q_L$$
Fig. 1: Power diagram for inductive loads.
$$S = P - j Q_C$$
Fig. 2: Power diagram for capacitive loads.
Fig. 3: Impedance diagram for a series R-L-C circuit.
Fig. 4: The result of multiplying each vector of Fig. 3 by $I^2$ for a series RLC circuit.
Since the reactive power and average power are always angled $90^\circ$ to each other, the three powers are related by the Pythagorean theorem; that is,
$$ \bbox[10px,border:1px solid grey]{S^2 = P^2 + Q^2} \tag{1} $$
It is particularly interesting that the equation
$$\bbox[10px,border:1px solid grey]{ S = VI^*} \tag{2}$$
Fig. 5: Demonstrating the validity of Eq. (2).
$$ I = { V \over Z_T} = { 10 \angle 0^\circ \over 3Ω + j 4Ω}\\
= { 10 \angle 0^\circ \over 5 Ω \angle 53.13^\circ} = 2A \angle -53.13^\circ $$
$$ P = I^2 R = (2 A)^2 (3 Ω) = 12W$$
$$ Q_L = I^2 X_L = (2 A)^2 (4 Ω) = 16 (\text{VAR})$$
$$S = P + j Q_L = 12 W + j 16 VAR (L) = 20 VA \angle 53.13^\circ$$
$$ S = V I^* = (10 V \angle 0^\circ)(2 A \angle 53.13^\circ)\\
= 20 VA \angle 53.13^\circ$$
Fig. 6: The power triangle for the circuit of
Fig. 5.
$$ P = VI \cos \theta$$
$$ P = S \cos \theta$$
$$ F_p = \cos \theta = { P \over S}$$
Be the first to comment here!

Do you have any questions?